May and might are both ways of
expressing possibility. Is there a difference between the ways in which they
should be used?
Some people insist that you
should use May (present tense) when
talking about a current situation and might
(past tense) when talking about an
event that happened in the past.
For example:
·
I may go home early if I’m tired.
(present tense)
·
He might have visited Italy before
settling in Nuremberg. (past tense)
In practice, this distinction is rarely made today and the two words are
generally interchangeable:
·
I might go home early if I’m tired.
·
He may have visited Italy before settling
in Nuremberg.
But there is a distinction between may have and might have in certain
contexts. If the truth of a situation is still not known at the time of
speaking or writing, either of the two is acceptable:
- · By the time you read this, he may have made his decision.
- · I think that comment might have offended some people.
If the event or situation referred
to did not in fact occur, it's better to use might have:
·
The draw
against Italy might have been a turning point, but it didn't turn out like
that.
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/may-or-might
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario